Welcome, Guest

NOTE: This is a "Community" forum. Please be mindful that community members are here to help as part of a community effort. We therefore appreciate your effort in keeping this forum a happy place!

If you have a specific issue (e.g. hardware, failure) and want help from our support team, please use our tech support portal (Support menu - > Contact Us).
Thanks a lot of your help in making a better community.

Page:
1

TOPIC:

nano DL versus nano HD 8 years 5 months ago #16160

daddieo
Topic Author
Offline
New Member
Posts: 2
Thank you received: 0

This is an open ended question but would like any input or guidance that anyone might have. What will do the better more complete job for my 7.2 system, the DL or the HD? I think the DL unit will provide everything I'm looking with less effort except for sub management so I would need to buy a 2 x 4 miniDSP to manage them. The HD unit will handle everything I'm trying to accomplish but will require a bit more work on my part. Also the HD version seems a bit redundant since my AVR, Yamaha RX-A2030, has a pretty good PEQ filtering system built in. Mainly I'm looking to get the best bang for my buck
Thanks

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

nano DL versus nano HD 8 years 5 months ago #16166

john.reekie Offline Platinum Member Posts: 3778 Thank you received: 1593	Hi, if you're happy with the bass management in your Yamaha, I'd think the DL would be the version to go for as it will do impulse response correction, which you can't do in the receiver. (As well as the room correction with target curves) The following user(s) said Thank You: devteam
	Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation. Last edit: by john.reekie.

Page:
1

Moderators: devteam

Support

Community Forum

Community Support

nanoAVR

nano DL versus nano HD