Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
Here is the place to share your questions/comments about your setup of the UMIK-1 USB measurement microphone


NOTE: This is a "Community" forum. Please be mindful that community members are here to help as part of a community effort. We therefore appreciate your effort in keeping this forum a happy place!

If you have a specific issue (e.g. hardware, failure) and want help from our support team, please use our tech support portal (Support menu - > Contact Us).
Thanks a lot of your help in making a better community.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

TOPIC:

Re: Low quality design or faulty mic ? 10 years 5 months ago #8802

  • miki_ada
  • miki_ada's Avatar
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Posts: 10
  • Thank you received: 0
Hi everybody!
I started to mod my mic. This is the first result with a generic 220uf electrolytic installed where George suggested:

noise floor without cap:


noise floor with cap:


So a great first result. No spikes at all!!

I'll now try with an LT1763 3.3V regulator to see if the noise floor can even go down. Indeed George has a noise floor of about -90dBFS while I achived about 53-133= -80dbFS.

Unfortunately I don't have a good selection of smd parts so I can't test the mod suggested from minidsp team :(

off topic: how can you switch from db to dbfs scale in REW? so we can compare better our results!

thanks!!

Michele

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by miki_ada.

Re: Low quality design or faulty mic ? 10 years 5 months ago #8805

  • miki_ada
  • miki_ada's Avatar
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Posts: 10
  • Thank you received: 0

My mic has serial number 0565, is it affected? Thanks.


I think... It's affected. Mine is #0514 and has got the spikes from 1kHz as you can see from the graph. Open rew and do a measure with no sound in your room (measure the silence :) )

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re: Low quality design or faulty mic ? 10 years 5 months ago #8809

  • willshui
  • willshui's Avatar
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Posts: 2
  • Thank you received: 0
hi, your pictures are too small to see. Can you tell me how to measure the "silence"? Thanks.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re: Low quality design or faulty mic ? 10 years 5 months ago #8816

  • monomer
  • monomer's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Senior Member
  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 41
  • Thank you received: 3

...Simple mod:
It will give you about 17 db of improvement and it only takes one capacitor:...

Hey George, thanks for the work you've done on finding a fix... Question: any suggestion on where to find one of these capacitors? I looked on eBay and Amazon and I'm confused, not so easy to find.

...NOTE that these changes are to be made by end users knowing how to rework an SMD. If you need help, feel free to get in touch with us. We are planning to do a new batch of SMD board that could be replaced with a simple soldering job. We'll soon give an update to the whole community. It just takes time to work a manufacturing batch last minute...

What size are these resistors? I can only do down to 805 as that's the limit of my equipment and my eyesight (not to mention shaky hands... I'm 62). How do we know which Rev we have? do they correspond to batch? like first batch is Rev A, second batch is Rev B and third batch is Rev C? Are you saying a reworked board will be available to all owners of a Rev B UMIK who wish to swap out their current board? Any details on the specifics of how this updated board mod is going to be 'rolled out' to the owners who want/need it?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by monomer.

Re: Low quality design or faulty mic ? 10 years 5 months ago #8817

  • monomer
  • monomer's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Senior Member
  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 41
  • Thank you received: 3

...off topic: how can you switch from db to dbfs scale in REW? so we can compare better our results!...

In the upper left of the RTA window there is a little drop down box... click on it and select.

hi, your pictures are too small to see. Can you tell me how to measure the "silence"? Thanks.

Use the RTA window and wrap your mic in a towel if need be to achieve a lower silence.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by monomer.

Re: Low quality design or faulty mic ? 10 years 5 months ago #8819

  • miki_ada
  • miki_ada's Avatar
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Posts: 10
  • Thank you received: 0

hi, your pictures are too small to see

sorry, here are the images.

without any additional cap:


with 220uF:


Can you tell me how to measure the "silence"? Thanks

As suggested by monomer, you have only to do a measurement with rew as usual but in a silent room.

Question: any suggestion on where to find one of these capacitors? I looked on eBay and Amazon and I'm confused, not so easy to find.

There are many suppliers of electronic parts. Farnell, Mouser, RS components, Digikey are some of the biggest in the world. On ebay you will find (search 220uf 10V) it and you will pay less of shipment if you buy it in your country.
Anyway, if you are looking for something like this (the caps that gives the results in the previous image, it's a 220uf 16V electrolytic capacitor, but better is a 220uF 6.3V that should be smaller)



you can find it maybe in electronic shops near your home.

What size are these resistors?

0603... but if you are used to 0805 you should be good even in 0603 ;)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by miki_ada.

Re: Low quality design or faulty mic ? 10 years 5 months ago #8862

  • etl17
  • etl17's Avatar
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Posts: 16
  • Thank you received: 1
My UMIK serial is 700-0635. Is this a revB or revC? Is there an offer for exchanging older versions for revC?

Thank you,

--Stefanos

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re: Low quality design or faulty mic ? 10 years 5 months ago #8915

  • devteam
  • devteam's Avatar
  • Away
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 9173
  • Thank you received: 1480
Dear All,

FYI, please have a look at this thread here if you have any questions with regards to this noise floor modification. www.minidsp.com/forum/18-umik-questions/8868-umik-1-update

Great work from Georgio and Michelle on the modifications! A simple test that can be performed once the microphone opened.

DevTeam
miniDSP, building a DSP community one board at a time.

For any official support, please contact our technical support team directly @ support.minidsp.com/support/home

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re: Low quality design or faulty mic ? 10 years 5 months ago #8941

  • miki_ada
  • miki_ada's Avatar
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Posts: 10
  • Thank you received: 0
Ok guys, here I am.
I did various test on the Umik-1 to improve the noise floor.

First of all, I used a netbook (asus 1215B e-350) to do the test and my mic serial is 0514.

Second thing, after some while, I noticed that the mic is noisy itself but the supply provided from the USB port can really do some mess and increase the performance of the mic. WIth my netbook, I found that with or without the external power adaptor the things changed a lot.
So, I repeated some test, but not all because the cable that connects the mic to the circuit were damaged after many tests and I even break a part of the PCB for my fault.

Third, I think the best thing to do is to put a capacitor where George suggested. It's very easy to do and with an electrolytic 470uF 6,3V almost all the noise is suppressed. It's a simple and powerful mod. On my netbook, the noise is very low even with the power adaptor. I putted an extra capacitor (100uF 10V) after the ferrite bead used to filter the usb supply but it's not so useful I think. Anyway it should not make the things worse.

Fourth thing: I build up a low noise reg with a LT1763 3,3V to feed biasing circuit of the capsule (look on the web for miniVreg) but the results are worse than the simple capacitor. Really. For sure it's not a circuit designed for this particular chase but if you want to use a low noise reg it's up to you. It could be very useful with high internal gain (24/30/36dB) but only if projected ad hoc.

Last thing: I sat the internal gain at 12dB. For sure the noise floor increase but for me this is a good set-up so I can use the mic not only for loudspeaker measurements. You have to modify the value in the calibration files. For me I changed from "Sens Factor =-22.68dB, SERNO: 7000514" to "Sens Factor =-10.68dB, SERNO: 7000514" (12db gain).

Now the results and some photos. Let me know.

Original mic without any mod, no power supply:


Original mic without any mod, with power supply:


Mic with 220uF cap, no supply::


Mic with 220uF cap, with supply:


Mic with LT1763 3,3V, no power supply:


Mic with LT1763 3,3V, with power supply:


Mic with 470uF on mic power line + 100uF on 5V supply, no supply:


Mic with 470uF on mic power line + 100uF on 5V supply, with supply:


Mic enclosed (470uF on mic power line + 100uF on 5V supply), no supply:


Mic enclosed (470uF on mic power line + 100uF on 5V supply), with supply:


Photos of the mod:

LT1763 regulator (the two resistor inparallel are used to obtain 1950Ohm)




Two capactor mod (470uF 6,3V and 100uF 10V suggested)


the smaller capactor is soldered on the pins of the input 3,3V regulator


the bigger capacitor is applied on 3,3V supply of the mic capsule:



Hope it helps.....


Michele

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re: Low quality design or faulty mic ? 10 years 4 months ago #8949

  • devteam
  • devteam's Avatar
  • Away
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 9173
  • Thank you received: 1480
@ Michele,

Thanks for the very good update! Unfortunately, it seems like the picture are not showing for some reason. We have a little bug on this forum under firefox it seems to post pics. We're doing a website upgrade these days so it will be fixed in new website. In the mean time, you can post the pics using Internet Explorer.

As for your comments, we agree that indeed adding a capacitor is indeed the easiest way to go at it.

DevTeam
miniDSP, building a DSP community one board at a time.

For any official support, please contact our technical support team directly @ support.minidsp.com/support/home

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re: Low quality design or faulty mic ? 10 years 4 months ago #8960

  • miki_ada
  • miki_ada's Avatar
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Posts: 10
  • Thank you received: 0
I did various test on the Umik-1 to improve the noise floor.

First of all, I used a netbook (asus 1215B e-350) to do the test and my mic serial is 0514.

Second thing, after some while, I noticed that the mic is noisy itself but the supply provided from the USB port can really do some mess and increase the performance of the mic. WIth my netbook, I found that with or without the external power adaptor the things changed a lot.
So, I repeated some test, but not all because the cable that connects the mic to the circuit were damaged after many tests and I even break a part of the PCB for my fault.

Third, I think the best thing to do is to put a capacitor where George suggested. It's very easy to do and with an electrolytic 470uF 6,3V almost all the noise is suppressed. It's a simple and powerful mod. On my netbook, the noise is very low even with the power adaptor. I putted an extra capacitor (100uF 10V) after the ferrite bead used to filter the usb supply but it's not so useful I think. Anyway it should not make the things worse.

Fourth thing: I build up a low noise reg with a LT1763 3,3V to feed biasing circuit of the capsule (look on the web for miniVreg) but the results are worse than the simple capacitor. Really. For sure it's not a circuit designed for this particular chase but if you want to use a low noise reg it's up to you. It could be very useful with high internal gain (24/30/36dB) but only if projected ad hoc.

Last thing: I sat the internal gain at 12dB. For sure the noise floor increase but for me this is a good set-up so I can use the mic not only for loudspeaker measurements. You have to modify the value in the calibration files. For me I changed from "Sens Factor =-22.68dB, SERNO: 7000514" to "Sens Factor =-10.68dB, SERNO: 7000514" (12db gain).

Now the results and some photos. Let me know.

Original mic without any mod, no power supply:


Original mic without any mod, with power supply:


Mic with 220uF cap, no supply::


Mic with 220uF cap, with supply:


Mic with LT1763 3,3V, no power supply:


Mic with LT1763 3,3V, with power supply:


Mic with 470uF on mic power line + 100uF on 5V supply, no supply:


Mic with 470uF on mic power line + 100uF on 5V supply, with supply:


Mic enclosed (470uF on mic power line + 100uF on 5V supply), no supply:


Mic enclosed (470uF on mic power line + 100uF on 5V supply), with supply:


Photos of the mod:

LT1763 regulator (the two resistor inparallel are used to obtain 1950Ohm)




Two capactor mod (470uF 6,3V and 100uF 10V suggested)


the smaller capactor is soldered on the pins of the input 3,3V regulator


the bigger capacitor is applied on 3,3V supply of the mic capsule:



Hope it helps.....


Michele

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by miki_ada.

Re: Low quality design or faulty mic ? 10 years 4 months ago #8961

  • miki_ada
  • miki_ada's Avatar
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Posts: 10
  • Thank you received: 0
Sorry Devteam, I'm working to made the pics visible... can you cancel this and the previous one post? Keep the first with the pictures not visible, I need the url of the pics....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re: Low quality design or faulty mic ? 10 years 4 months ago #9010

  • miki_ada
  • miki_ada's Avatar
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Posts: 10
  • Thank you received: 0

Ok guys, here I am.
I did various test on the Umik-1 to improve the noise floor.

First of all, I used a netbook (asus 1215B e-350) to do the test and my mic serial is 0514.

Second thing, after some while, I noticed that the mic is noisy itself but the supply provided from the USB port can really do some mess and increase the performance of the mic. WIth my netbook, I found that with or without the external power adaptor the things changed a lot.
So, I repeated some test, but not all because the cable that connects the mic to the circuit were damaged after many tests and I even break a part of the PCB for my fault.

Third, I think the best thing to do is to put a capacitor where George suggested. It's very easy to do and with an electrolytic 470uF 6,3V almost all the noise is suppressed. It's a simple and powerful mod. On my netbook, the noise is very low even with the power adaptor. I putted an extra capacitor (100uF 10V) after the ferrite bead used to filter the usb supply but it's not so useful I think. Anyway it should not make the things worse.

Fourth thing: I build up a low noise reg with a LT1763 3,3V to feed biasing circuit of the capsule (look on the web for miniVreg) but the results are worse than the simple capacitor. Really. For sure it's not a circuit designed for this particular chase but if you want to use a low noise reg it's up to you. It could be very useful with high internal gain (24/30/36dB) but only if projected ad hoc.

Last thing: I sat the internal gain at 12dB. For sure the noise floor increase but for me this is a good set-up so I can use the mic not only for loudspeaker measurements. You have to modify the value in the calibration files. For me I changed from "Sens Factor =-22.68dB, SERNO: 7000514" to "Sens Factor =-10.68dB, SERNO: 7000514" (12db gain).

Now the results and some photos. Let me know.

Original mic without any mod, no power supply:


Original mic without any mod, with power supply:


Mic with 220uF cap, no supply::


Mic with 220uF cap, with supply:


Mic with LT1763 3,3V, no power supply:


Mic with LT1763 3,3V, with power supply:


Mic with 470uF on mic power line + 100uF on 5V supply, no supply:


Mic with 470uF on mic power line + 100uF on 5V supply, with supply:


Mic enclosed (470uF on mic power line + 100uF on 5V supply), no supply:


Mic enclosed (470uF on mic power line + 100uF on 5V supply), with supply:


Photos of the mod:

LT1763 regulator (the two resistor inparallel are used to obtain 1950Ohm)




Two capactor mod (470uF 6,3V and 100uF 10V suggested)


the smaller capactor is soldered on the pins of the input 3,3V regulator


the bigger capacitor is applied on 3,3V supply of the mic capsule:



Hope it helps.....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Low quality design or faulty mic ? 11 months 1 week ago #62342

  • tolik212
  • tolik212's Avatar
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Posts: 1
  • Thank you received: 0
There is still space for improvement in 2022. Here are two files with and without USB power filters. The difference is audible.
I have no idea how noisy USB power should be, but in my case, noise from USB is enough to impact the signal path.
Files were recorded on the max gain setting of the win sound mixer.
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
Moderators: devteam