Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
NOTE: This forum is community powered. Please be mindful that long time community members are here to help as part of a community effort. If you have a specific issue (e.g. hardware, failure), please use our tech support portal (Support menu - > Contact Us). Thanks a lot of your help in making a better community. :-)

TOPIC: nanoAVR HD for a 7.4

nanoAVR HD for a 7.4 2 years 3 months ago #15421

  • javiersc
  • javiersc's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Posts: 3
  • Karma: 0
Hello:

I am currently using 2 MiniDsp 8x8 for the following system

- 3 frontal speakers biamplified with a MiniDsp 8x8
- 4 surrounds and 4 SW with another 9x8

I would like to know if I would have to use 2 new NanoAVR HD, although it seems to me that that would not be possible due to the connections.

Thanks in advance
The administrator has disabled public write access.

nanoAVR HD for a 7.4 2 years 3 months ago #15431

  • john.reekie
  • john.reekie's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 2286
  • Thank you received: 861
  • Karma: 99
I don't know if anyone has tried it, but I think that in theory you could use an HDMI splitter, two nanoAVR, and two A/V processors to accomplish what you want. Probably best to draw up a complete signal diagram. One possible problem (apart from the cost) would be volume control across the parallel units.

But, you have a working system already... :)
I am not miniDSP support.

"You must ask the right questions." - Dr. Alfred Lanning's hologram.
-> Have you read the User Manual??
-> Have you drawn and posted a diagram?
-> Have you posted a screenshot?
-> Have you posted your config file?
The administrator has disabled public write access.

nanoAVR HD for a 7.4 2 years 3 months ago #15436

  • javiersc
  • javiersc's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Posts: 3
  • Karma: 0
Well..... If I have to do something like that it obviously does not pay off.

As you say I have a working system and I could not be happier with the results and in my case would make more sense to try the Dirac Pc Version in order to see if there are any real improvements or everything can be done via PC

Thanks !
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Time to create page: 0.098 seconds